Thursday, March 19, 2009

AIG Thoughts

AIG Thoughts
I have pondered this current manufactured event and it reminds me of an over blown Punch & Judy event without the puppeteers being hidden. My wife and I told our eldest when he was about 15 that he needed to quit being bad because he was no good at it. This whole debacle reminds me of the time when some fresh cookies went missing and my boys both swore up and down it wasn’t them even though there were crumbs on their shirts and chocolate on their faces. The AIG situation is a lot like that.

People are blowing this deal way out of proportion. Ok the money is huge but the nuts and bolts are exposed for all who care about accuracy to see for themselves. Let’s break it down. Let’s say that you are an insurance/financial wizard. AIG wants to get you into their talent pool. You are a free agent and you negotiate your package that includes a $1million bonus somewhere in the life of the contract. You sign up and everything is golden right?

Nope a couple of divisions within AIG are threatening to do a financial Hindenberg impersonation. No worries. You have a contract with the parent company. Just like Avis or Jiffy Lube or the Santa Barbara Police might have a contract with a part of AIG. AIG is legally bound to meet the terms for their side of the contracts.

The whiz bang stimulus/bailout package that came down the pipe included exemptions to scrutiny/oversight or any other hoo haw regarding these large bonuses. Basically these preexisting contracts get a pass and are allowed to remain in effect.

Now the authors of the package that accepts these contracts as is feign ignorance as to the existence of these contracts and express outrage at the greed and insensitivity the recipients have exhibited. What the….? These guys just put a deal together and did their part and now want what is rightfully theirs. This is bad why? It doesn’t matter how much the deals were for. These were exempted legal deals put together prior to the bail out and everybody that is in authority is acting mad with many load harumphs to prove their distaste for this unseemly behavior. The recipients did nothing wrong. Maybe the AIG guys writing the contracts did something wrong when they wrote the contracts but that is a business deal. They did nothing illegal.

Ok with all these exemptions and non illegalities, why all the hubbub? Why are the recipients being set up as bad guys?

http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/16/cuomo-seeks-aig-bonus-information/
http://www.newser.com/story/53597/73-aig-execs-got-1m-bonuses-cuomo.html
http://www.daylife.com/article/0208gpP032fvT

Outrage? Outrage? They knew about it before. It was legal. The “outraged” gave them a pass and now when the public calls BS instead of standing up like honorable adults and explaining their rationale for the exemptions they point the finger at the legal participants declaring them bad and immoral. AIG probably wrote these contracts with their fingers crossed but that was their legal business right to do that.

In this case, who is really bad, immoral and illegal? AIG or our fearless leaders?

No comments:

Post a Comment